Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 443, 2024 Apr 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38600440

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Altered glycosylation is a hallmark of cancer associated with therapy resistance and tumor behavior. In this study, we investigated the glycosylation profile of stemness-related proteins OCT4, CIP2A, MET, and LIMA1 in HNSCC tumors. METHODS: Tumor, adjacent normal tissue, and blood samples of 25 patients were collected together with clinical details. After tissue processing, lectin-based glycovariant screens were performed. RESULTS: Strong correlation between glycosylation profiles of all four stemness-related proteins was observed in tumor tissue, whereas glycosylation in tumor tissue, adjacent normal tissue, and serum was differential. CONCLUSIONS: A mannose- and galactose-rich glycosylation niche associated with stemness-related proteins was identified.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Humans , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Glycosylation , Cell Line, Tumor , Cytoskeletal Proteins/metabolism
2.
J Laryngol Otol ; 136(2): 176-180, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34649636

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implantation can be used when a patient's hearing cannot satisfactorily be improved after optimised hearing aid fitting. However, in patients with a cochlear nerve or brain disorder affecting hearing, the benefits of cochlear implants are not so straightforward. METHODS: This paper describes a 58-year-old patient suffering from multiple sclerosis and profound sensorineural hearing loss, rehabilitated with a cochlear implant. Literature concerning cochlear implantation in demyelinating conditions was systematically reviewed using PubMed/Medline and Web of Science databases. RESULTS: The patient's cochlear implantation was successful, with speech discrimination scores remaining above 90 per cent for eight years post-operatively. No previous cases of cochlear implantation with multiple sclerosis related hearing loss have been reported, despite the high incidence of hearing loss in multiple sclerosis patients. CONCLUSION: This paper demonstrates that multiple sclerosis lesions should not be an exclusion criterion in an otherwise suitable candidate for cochlear implantation.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Multiple Sclerosis/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/complications , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
3.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 278(11): 4575-4585, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33582846

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Prognostic biomarkers and novel therapeutic approaches have been slow to emerge in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In this study, an HNSCC patient cohort is created and performance of putative prognostic biomarkers investigated in a population-validated setting. The overall goal is to develop a novel way to combine biomarker analyses with population-level clinical data on HNSCC patients and thus to improve the carryover of biomarkers into clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To avoid selection biases in retrospective study design, all HNSCC patients were identified and corresponding clinical data were collected from the Southwest Finland geographical area. A particular emphasis was laid on avoiding potential biases in sample selection for immunohistochemical staining analyses. Staining results were evaluated for potential prognostic resolution. RESULTS: After comprehensive evaluation, the patient cohort was found to be representative of the background population in terms of clinical characteristics such as patient age and TNM stage distribution. A negligible drop-out of 1.3% (6/476) was observed during the first follow-up year. By immunohistochemical analysis, the role of previously implicated HNSCC biomarkers (p53, EGFR, p16, CIP2A, Oct4, MET, and NDFIP1) was investigated. DISCUSSION: Our exceptionally representative patient material supports the use of population validation to improve the applicability of results to real-life situations. The failure of the putative prognostic biomarkers emphasizes the need for controlling bias in retrospective studies, especially in the heterogenous tumor environment of HNSCC. The resolution of simple prognostic examination is unlikely to be sufficient to identify biomarkers for clinical practice of HNSCC.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Biomarkers, Tumor , Finland/epidemiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnosis , Humans , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...